Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id BAA00343 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 01:11:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzxdw15614; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 01:07:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA16835; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 01:08:11 -0500
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 01:08:11 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <m0tY5Ez-0000ECC@crash.cts.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: bwhitake@cts.com (Bryan Whitaker)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Particle Storm
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>On Wed, 3 Jan 1996, pdavies@magnet.com (paul davies) wrote:
>>><< What have people's experiences been with Sparks?
>>One of the distributors we get our software from advised us to get Particle
>>Storm instead of Sparks. It's by the company that made Impact. Does anyone
>>know anything about it?
>
> They only thing I know is that Particle Storm is still in beta, while